Amazon necessities guys’s traditional-in shape stretch golf pant

(8 customer reviews)


  • 98% polyester, 2% spandex
  • imported
  • machine wash
  • those conventional cut golfing pants are designed with a moisture-wicking, performance fabric to assist preserve you dry
  • a chunk of stretch provides consolation and flexibility and makes this golfing pants a cross-to on or off the links
  • features slant pockets at each aspect and set-in pockets on the again
  • sits obviously at waist, roomy through seat and thigh, designed with a touch stretch for choicest performance and all day comfort
  • sport made higher: we pay attention to consumer comments and first-class-track every element to ensure nice, healthy, and luxury
SKU: C18IK6WM4M631 Category:

from the manufacturer

product description

an amazon brand – those traditional reduce golfing pants are designed with a moisture-wicking, overall performance cloth to help maintain you dry

amazon necessities is targeted on growing low-priced, first-rate, and long-lasting regular garb you may depend on. Our line of fellows’s have to-haves includes polo shirts, chino pants, conventional-healthy shorts, casual button-downs, and group-neck tees. Our consistent sizing takes the guesswork out of shopping, and each piece is put to the test to keep the best requirements in excellent and luxury.


28W x 28L, 28W x 30L, 28W x 32L, 29W x 30L, 29W x 32L, 29W x 34L, 30W x 29L, 30W x 32L, 30W x 34L, 31W x 28L, 31W x 29L, 31W x 30L, 31W x 32L, 31W x 34L, 32W x 28L, 32W x 30L, 32W x 31L, 32W x 32L, 32W x 33L, 32W x 34L, 33W x 28L, 33W x 30L, 33W x 32L, 34W x 28L, 34W x 29L, 34W x 30L, 34W x 31L, 34W x 32L, 34W x 34L, 35W x 28L, 35W x 30L, 35W x 32L, 36W x 28L, 36W x 29L, 36W x 30L, 36W x 32L, 36W x 33L, 36W x 34L, 38W x 28L, 38W x 29L, 38W x 30L, 38W x 32L, 40W x 29L, 40W x 30L, 42W x 28L, 42W x 29L, 42W x 30L, 42W x 32L, 42W x 34L


Black, Gray, Khaki, Navy, Olive, Stone

8 reviews for Amazon necessities guys’s traditional-in shape stretch golf pant

  1. Sean T.

    Nice material, seems like good quality. I’m a 32×30, they fit perfectly around the waist but the legs seemed about .5” long. Also, I typically prefer a more “athletic” or “slim” cut. I’d consider these pants more of a “regular” cut, they’re by no means baggy but a little looser than I typically wear. If these were $50 I wouldn’t be thrilled, but for the price I have zero complaints! Read more

  2. IceSyckel

    First, these would likely be fine for cold climates, but in Georgia (US) where I am from? They are way too thick and non-breathable for their intended function (golf). Haggar offers a (more expsnive) alternative that is far thinner and more breathable than these. Again, in a colder climate, these may be ideal, but they are of no use for their purpose anywhere south of the Mason-Dixon line and probably most places north of that in the summertime. Alone, the above would only get these 3 stars. However, they also are far tighter in the thighs and crotch than Amazon’s “classic” (i.e., relaxed) fit would imply. Granted, the waist is plenty relaxed and would stretch regardless, but they gave no thought to the legs. My waist is rarely the problem – I am a large (not fat) man. My stomach/waist fits pants like these fine, but I get relaxed/classic fit pants because I have large thigh muscles (for my waist, if it were not for my thighs, I’d want regular or even slim fit). So, if you do any lifting or exercises with your legs, these may not be the pants for you. I will return these, but there are probably people these would be perfect for. Read more

  3. Tom B

    These are nice pants! I was really surprised and excited about fit and quality…$25 bucks??? Come on… can’t beat it. Gonna buy every color. Perfect for someone like me who yoyo diets, can buy a few pairs in numerous sizes without breaking the bank. Perfect for office, casual or travel. All round great pants…and thank you Amazon for not putting 20 impossible to remove tags on them! Read more

  4. JT

    I like the quality of the pants but the sizing is off. I carefully measured my waist and bought the size with that same number, but they turned out to be 2 inches too big. Returned them and ordered the next smaller size. I guess you could buy three of whatever you want- size you think you wear and one larger and one smaller, knowing you would return 2 out of 3. Seems like it would be a lot better for amazon to just make the sizing match actual measurements. Read more

  5. Just Me

    It is always difficult for me to find the exact fit with pants because the waist and length in most popular brands don’t allow you to choose the exact waist and length. Boutique brands sometimes do (like Brooks Brothers) but Wranglerm Levi’s, etc. don’t. These amazon brand pants allow for exact measurements! Finally, no dragging on the floor and no “too small or too large in the waist”. What a score! They are nicely made and fit great. These are generously cut but still look sharp. I purchased a second pair immediately after trying these on. I also ordered some cargo pants, same brand. Whoever made the decision too offer ALL size combination really hit a homer! BTW, I often use Golf slacks with a blazer or dress jacket instead of dress pants cause they are so comfortable. These work great that way as long as it’s not too dressy or formal wear…even then I would wear them. Read more

  6. Gmo

    The 42/32 size fit as expected, and was well-constructed. At 6’ and 240, I was happy with a $25 gol pant. Unfortunately for me, the cut of the thigh was such that it pulled the back of the waist down with very step. I had to “hitch” my pants up with every 5-8 steps. Going up a flight of stairs almost pulled the pants down! I bought a pair of Underarmor golf pants at $60, same size, and wore them without problem. Read more

  7. Jonathan W Best

    These pants look great and fit well. The material used is a little heavier then what I normally get from brand name golf apparel companies, but it shouldn’t be too bad as they are still somewhat light. This material would be great in the cooler months for sure. They are a little baggier then I’d prefer but for the price, you can’t be it at all. Read more

  8. Leon3357

    Pros-quality material, low price Cons-pockets were shorter than I liked(simply a personal preference). material was heavier than what I was expecting for golf pants.(these will work in cooler temps) Read more

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Shopping Cart